The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search instagram avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content

Although vaginal mesh devices like Avaulta were intended to help women with weakened vaginal muscles suffering from conditions like stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), thousands have sustained permanent injuries due to the surgical implant of such devices. Over $20 million has already been awarded to women injured by vaginal mesh implants, and Avaulta manufacturer C.R. Bard faces thousands of lawsuits over complications allegedly caused by the devices.
What is Avaulta?
Avaulta is a synthetic or biosynthetic vaginal mesh device, including the Avaulta Biosynthetic, Avaulta Solo and Avaulta Plus Biosynthetic Support Systems that are intended to help hold pelvic organs in place. Avaulta’s design was based upon a type of surgical mesh that has been used to strengthen the abdominal muscles of patients who suffer from hernias. Vaginal mesh devices like Avaulta are surgically inserted by implanting the device through an incision in the vaginal wall.
During insertion, complications including bowel, bladder, and blood vessel perforation may occur, along with discomfort and pain due to vaginal scarring. Unfortunately, because of questionable design, incompatibility with the pelvic region of a woman’s body, and the potential for surgical mesh erosion, Avaulta devices have caused patients to experience serious injuries, including:
• Organ perforation
• Internal bleeding
• Infection
• Nerve damage
• Chronic pain

Many women have undergone multiple surgeries to remove vaginal mesh devices from their bodies, only to discover that the device cannot be completely removed. Further surgical complications have worsened the original incontinence or organ prolapse present before the initial procedure. Although there have been proposals to ban the use of pelvic mesh due to these and other post-operative complications, to date, no pelvic mesh ban is in effect.

FDA Warnings

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a health alert in 2008 stating that in the last three years, it had received more than 1,000 reports from nine surgical mesh manufacturers regarding complications associated with surgical mesh devices used to repair SUI and POP, among them Avaulta surgical mesh products.
In 2011, the FDA issued an update regarding additional data it has received linking pelvic and transvaginal mesh implants to serious complications, and questioning the effectiveness of transvaginal mesh in treating POP. The FDA advises that patients and healthcare providers consider non-mesh options and only consider pelvic or transvaginal mesh after a careful consideration of the risks versus the benefits.

Comments for this article are closed.